Summary and response Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Summary and response - Essay Example As a function of this level of profusion and the effects that it has on the individual, Jessica Statsky writes in her essay, â€Å"Children Need to Play, Not Compete† that this societal understanding and drive towards competition is ultimately extremely harmful. As a function of analyzing this piece, the following few paragraphs will seek to provide a summary of some of Statsky’s main ideas and draw inference upon the strength and tenor of these ideas. Ultimately, as the title implies, Statsky discusses the fact that competition is harmful to the means by which a child should develop. Instead of allowing this type of competitive streak to define the way in which children are raised, Statsky offers that a far more reasonable approach is to allow nature to take its course and allow children to develop at their own place through play. Although play has oftentimes been mischaracterized as a waste of time, the fact of the matter is that Statsky, as well as a host of other ch ild psychologists and developmental specialists, point to the fact that play serves an integral role in helping to develop a host of interactional and developmental goals within the child; goals that Statsky argues could never be realized within the unnatural and contrived realm of competition that children are all too often thrust into. ... Ultimately, long before reading Statsky’s piece, the reader came to an understanding that the unimaginative nature of competitive sports has served to constrain the abilities of children and harness their otherwise eager and unbridled sense of wonder and discovery. Due to the fact that the child is unable to integrate the differential between the overall importance of winning and the overall importance of understanding the more nuanced aspects of human behavior are not emphasized. This is of special importance due to the fact that the scope and importance of whatever sport is being engaged in is lost uon the child as the act of winning and losing becomes the sole drive that motivates the participant and defines the importance of reality(Statsky 3). Further, it is the understanding of this particular reviewer that one of the most negative aspects of the means by which competition integrates itself with the child is with relation to the fact that the child is oftentimes first in tegrated with the rules and understanding of competitive sport prior to being made aware of the rules that constrain society and morality in general. This of course represents the primal case of getting the priorities of life confused; thereby adding to a faulty and flawed understanding of the way in which individuals should prioritize and relate to one another. The reader should understand that although not all competitive sport is necessarily bad, the use of competitive sport as a means of educating children with regards to the realities of life and the means by which they should integrate with one another is fundamentally flawed. In such a way, it is the strong belief of this author that the ideas that were put forward by Statsky were precisely correct in

Listed companies are under increasing pressure from the media and Essay

Listed companies are under increasing pressure from the media and politicians to behave ethically. In recent months, c - Essay Example 7 Conclusion 10 References 11 Introduction In the modern day perspective, a director’s role is considered to be quite significant when concentrating upon the success factors or driving forces which can derive sustainable growth for a company. In the recent past, many occurrences have revealed the lack of ethical concerns, and the discrepancies persisting in the directors’ performances of listed companies owing to which the companies have been witnessing increasing pressure from the community including the media and even the politicians with relation to their ethical commitment and ‘green’ initiatives. It is in this context that Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 tends to play a major role in directing the roles and the responsibilities of the directors to preserve the success and the interests of the corporate being treated as two separate entities. However, in light of the prevailing occurrences of unethical conducts by directors as against the interest s of the company, it can be argued that certain amendments are required in the provisions mentioned under Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006. This paper aims at arguing on the basis of this particular aspect with reference to few case laws. Ethical responsibilities of A Director Under Section 172 Of The Companies Act 2006 The Companies Act 2006 is one of the major legislations, which governs the companies’ activities within the business periphery of the UK. It is one of the longest legislations, which has been passed in the UK with a large number of sections by its name. The main aim of the law is to modernise along with simplify the prevailing Companies Act in the UK. Moreover, it has been observed that this law is also meant to codify the duties of the directors in the companies. Furthermore, this Act would also grant much improved rights to shareholders of companies and it would also be effective in limiting the managerial burdens carried by the companies operating in t he UK1. One of the crucial impacts of the Companies Act 2006 is on the managers of the UK companies. The duties of the directors of the companies are codified with the emergence of this Act. It has been observed from the Section 172 of the Companies Act that the directors of the companies need to appreciate their duties towards organisations. The directors should work for the best interest of the companies. The directors should have to perform keeping in mind the ethical considerations. In this regard, the director should not accept any kind of benefits from any of the third parties. It would be unethical to the company if they perform activities in that manner. It has been evidently mentioned in the Companies Act that the directors would not be allowed to take any type of benefits from any of the third parties as it may harm organisations. Moreover, it has been viewed from Section 172 of the Act that the directors of organisations must act in a way that would said to be done in a g ood faith and to support the success relating to the company by considering the success of the interests of the members associated with it [Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Brothers]2. Additionally, it is the duty of the directors of organisations to think about the long-term consequences of his/her decisions which are also ethically important. Furthermore, it has also been assumed from Section 172 of the Act that the directors would also have to keep in mind the welfare or interests of the employees of organisations and do